vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and Fabrinet (FN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fabrinet is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $633.7M, roughly 1.8× CENTURY ALUMINUM CO). Fabrinet runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 0.3%, a 9.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fabrinet posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.9% vs 0.4%). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($67.7M vs $-5.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Fabrinet's revenue compounded faster (24.4% CAGR vs 13.8%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
FabrinetFNEarnings & Financial Report
Below is a list of companies having stocks that are included in the S&P MidCap 400 stock market index. The index, maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices, comprises the common stocks of 400 mid-cap, mostly American, companies. Although called the S&P 400, the index sometimes contains more than 400 stocks when it includes two or more share classes of stock from one of its component companies.
CENX vs FN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $112.6M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 35.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | 30.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $3.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $978.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $909.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $871.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $833.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $804.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $753.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $489.5M | $731.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $112.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $95.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $87.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $81.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $86.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $77.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $81.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.8M | $80.9M |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.4% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $3.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $2.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $2.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $2.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $2.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $2.22 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.26 | $2.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $960.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | $960.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | $968.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $934.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | $950.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $934.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $908.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $858.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.5M | $794.0M |
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $601.5M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | $46.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | $-5.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | 0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | $102.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $102.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $74.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $115.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $83.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $83.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.8M | $100.9M |
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | $45.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | $94.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $62.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $70.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.5M | $87.3M |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.1% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | 0.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | 0.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.06× | 1.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
FN
| Optical Communications | $832.6M | 73% |
| Non Optical Communications | $300.3M | 27% |
