vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and G III APPAREL GROUP LTD (GIII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
G III APPAREL GROUP LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($988.6M vs $633.7M, roughly 1.6× CENTURY ALUMINUM CO). G III APPAREL GROUP LTD runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs 0.3%, a 7.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.4% vs -9.0%). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($67.7M vs $-106.4M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 13.7%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
G III Apparel Group is a global fashion company that designs, sources, manufactures, markets and distributes apparel, footwear, and accessories under a range of owned and licensed well-known brands. It serves department stores, specialty retailers, and e-commerce platforms across North America, Europe, and other key global markets, catering to casual, sportswear, and premium fashion consumer segments.
CENX vs GIII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $988.6M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $80.6M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 11.4% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 8.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | -9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | -29.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $1.84 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | $988.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $583.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $839.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $644.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $609.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $489.5M | $764.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $80.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $48.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $114.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.8M | $28.9M |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 40.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 39.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 39.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 42.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 36.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.4% | 3.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $1.84 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $0.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $2.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.26 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $184.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $6.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | $184.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | $301.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $257.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | $181.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $104.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $414.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $508.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.5M | $507.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $213.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $402.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $402.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $402.8M |
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $601.5M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.26× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | $-97.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | $-106.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | -10.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | -1.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | $367.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | $-97.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $75.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $93.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $333.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $-111.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $49.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $45.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.8M | $361.3M |
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $-106.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $64.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $85.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | $323.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | $-120.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $38.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $32.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.5M | $352.3M |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 38.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | -11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.1% | 46.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | -1.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | 6.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.09× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | 6.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | -0.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | 2.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.06× | 12.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
GIII
| Proprietary Brands | $498.1M | 50% |
| Licensed Brands | $479.2M | 48% |
| Retail Segment | $45.7M | 5% |
