vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and JBT Marel Corp (JBTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JBT Marel Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $633.7M, roughly 1.6× CENTURY ALUMINUM CO). JBT Marel Corp runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 0.3%, a 5.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JBT Marel Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (115.6% vs 0.4%). JBT Marel Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($83.5M vs $67.7M). Over the past eight quarters, JBT Marel Corp's revenue compounded faster (60.3% CAGR vs 13.8%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
JBT Marel Corporation, formerly known as JBT Corporation, or John Bean Technologies Corporation, is a food processing machinery and automated vehicle company. The company was incorporated in 2008 when FMC Technologies divested its non-energy businesses. The company is based in Chicago, Illinois and traces its history back to a company founded in 1884 by John Bean, an orchardist in Los Gatos, California.
CENX vs JBTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $53.1M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 34.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 7.2% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 115.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | 858.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $934.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $854.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $467.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $453.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $402.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $489.5M | $392.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $53.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $-173.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $38.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.8M | $22.8M |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | 34.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 35.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 34.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 35.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | -3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 7.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | -20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.4% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $1.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $1.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $-3.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $1.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.26 | $0.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $167.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $4.5B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | $167.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $648.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $647.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $647.0M |
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $601.5M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $8.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.43× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | $117.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | $83.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | 8.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | 2.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | $117.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $87.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $102.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $128.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $71.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.8M | $10.4M |
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $56.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $83.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | $14.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $65.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.5M | $-100.0K |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.1% | -0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | 2.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | 1.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.06× | 0.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
JBTM
Segment breakdown not available.
