vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and SCANSOURCE, INC. (SCSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SCANSOURCE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($766.5M vs $633.7M, roughly 1.2× CENTURY ALUMINUM CO). SCANSOURCE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs 0.3%, a 1.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SCANSOURCE, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.5% vs 0.4%). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($67.7M vs $28.9M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 0.9%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
ScanSource, Inc. is a leading global specialty technology distributor offering a broad portfolio of solutions including point-of-sale systems, barcode scanning tools, cybersecurity products, cloud services and communication solutions. It primarily serves value-added resellers, managed service providers and enterprise clients across North America, Latin America and Europe, covering retail, healthcare, industrial and public sector core segments.
CENX vs SCSC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $766.5M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $16.5M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | -3.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | $766.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $739.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $812.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $704.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $747.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $775.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $746.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $489.5M | $752.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $17.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.8M | $12.8M |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.4% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $0.74 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.26 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $83.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $910.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | $124.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $126.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | $146.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $110.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $145.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $185.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.5M | $159.1M |
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | $910.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $914.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $906.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $901.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $900.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $920.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $924.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $601.5M | $944.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | $30.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | $28.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | 1.87× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | $30.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $66.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $44.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.8M | $160.2M |
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $28.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $42.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.5M | $157.7M |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.1% | 21.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | 1.87× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | 3.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | -0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | 2.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.06× | 12.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
SCSC
| Products And Services | $723.4M | 94% |
| Intelisys Advisory | $25.0M | 3% |
| Recurring Revenue | $18.2M | 2% |
