vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and SM Energy Co (SM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SM Energy Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($704.9M vs $633.7M, roughly 1.1× CENTURY ALUMINUM CO). On growth, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.4% vs -17.3%). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 12.2%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
SM Energy Company is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
CENX vs SM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $704.9M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | -17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | $704.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $811.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $792.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $844.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $852.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $643.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $634.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $489.5M | $559.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $201.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $182.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $240.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $210.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.8M | $131.2M |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 44.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 31.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.4% | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $1.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $1.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $2.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $1.82 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.26 | $1.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $368.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $4.8B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $9.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | $368.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | $54.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $487.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.5M | $506.3M |
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $601.5M | $3.7B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $6.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | $451.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $505.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $571.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $483.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $578.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $452.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $476.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.8M | $276.0M |
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | 3.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | 2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.06× | 2.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
SM
Segment breakdown not available.
