vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CENTURY ALUMINUM CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($633.7M vs $425.3M, roughly 1.5× Verisign). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 0.3%, a 48.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs 0.4%). Verisign produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.1M vs $67.7M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 5.2%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
CENX vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $387.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $489.5M | $384.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.8M | $194.1M |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 87.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 87.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.4% | 50.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.26 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $689.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.5M | $924.7M |
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $-1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $601.5M | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $160.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.8M | $257.3M |
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.5M | $253.5M |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.1% | 66.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.06× | 1.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
VRSN
Segment breakdown not available.
