vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CF Industries (CF) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.1× CF Industries). CF Industries runs the higher net margin — 26.4% vs 15.8%, a 10.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CF Industries posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.8% vs 11.3%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $313.0M). Over the past eight quarters, CF Industries's revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 10.5%).
CF Industries Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and distributor of agricultural fertilizers, including ammonia, urea, and ammonium nitrate products. The company is based in Northbrook, Illinois, a suburb of Chicago, and was founded in 1946 as the Central Farmers Fertilizer Company. For its first 56 years, it was a federation of regional agricultural supply cooperatives. CF then demutualized, and became a publicly traded company.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
CF vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $495.0M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | 40.9% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 33.0% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 26.4% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 22.8% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.3% | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.56 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.0M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $460.0M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $492.0M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.0M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $392.0M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $341.0M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $506.0M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.9% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.4% | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.4% | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.4% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.0% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.0% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.3% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.4% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.6% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.6% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.7% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.1% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.7% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.56 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.19 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.37 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.85 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.86 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.55 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.30 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $14.1B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.66× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.1B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.8B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.66× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.60× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.54× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $539.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $313.0M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.7% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.1% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.09× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.8B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $539.0M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $563.0M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $586.0M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $420.0M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $931.0M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $475.0M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $313.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $717.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $318.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $454.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $223.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $792.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $391.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.31× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.14× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.67× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.07× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.73× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.94× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CF
| Ammonia | $591.0M | 32% |
| UAN | $493.0M | 26% |
| Urea | $372.0M | 20% |
| Other | $244.0M | 13% |
| Other Products | $147.0M | 8% |
| Ammonium Nitrate Segment | $25.0M | 1% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
