vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CULLEN/FROST BANKERS, INC. (CFR) and Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lightspeed Commerce Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($823.4M vs $580.9M, roughly 1.4× CULLEN/FROST BANKERS, INC.). CULLEN/FROST BANKERS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 28.6% vs -11.1%, a 39.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Lightspeed Commerce Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (89.1% CAGR vs 7.6%).
Frost Bank is an American bank based in San Antonio that is chartered in Texas, with 200 branches and 1,750 automated teller machines in the state. It is the primary subsidiary of Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc., a bank holding company. It is one of the 60 largest banks of the country by total assets.
Lightspeed Commerce is a point-of-sale and e-commerce software provider based in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. It was founded in 2005 by Dax da Silva, who was its CEO until February 2022. It has offices in Montreal, New York, Ottawa, Toronto, London, Belfast, Amsterdam, Berlin, Geneva, Ghent, Melbourne, Ulyanovsk, Yerevan and Tbilisi. It offers its services to retail, restaurant, and hospitality businesses.
CFR vs LSPD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $580.9M | $823.4M |
| Net Profit | $166.3M | $-91.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | 34.1% | -14.1% |
| Net Margin | 28.6% | -11.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.56 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $580.9M | $823.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $567.3M | $543.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $546.9M | $266.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $540.2M | $253.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $536.3M | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $518.0M | $439.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $507.9M | $209.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $501.4M | $230.2M |
| Q4 25 | $166.3M | $-91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $174.4M | $-64.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.0M | $-35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.9M | $-575.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $154.9M | $-131.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.5M | $-91.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.5M | $-48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $135.7M | $-32.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 42.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 43.3% |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | -14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.7% | -15.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | -16.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.2% | -228.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | -23.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.8% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.5% | -27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.2% | -17.9% |
| Q4 25 | 28.6% | -11.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.7% | -11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | -13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.9% | -227.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | -19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.3% | -20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.6% | -23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.1% | -14.1% |
| Q4 25 | $2.56 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.67 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.39 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.30 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.36 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.24 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.21 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.06 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.6B | — |
| Total Assets | $53.0B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $53.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.5B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $274.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $127.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 21.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $116.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $274.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $248.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-296.1M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $989.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $307.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $129.6M | $-26.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $488.4M | $-28.5M |
| Q4 25 | $127.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $211.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-337.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $861.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $281.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $450.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 160.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 89.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.39× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.10× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.60× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
