vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMPUGEN LTD (CGEN) and ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD (ESLT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.8M vs $3.5M, roughly 1.6× COMPUGEN LTD). ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs -410.1%, a 416.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD produced more free cash flow last quarter ($319.6K vs $-18.8M).
Compugen Ltd. is a clinical-stage publicly traded predictive drug discovery and development company headquartered in Israel, with shares traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Compugen was established as computational drug discovery service provider in 1993. Compugen originally acted as service provider for pharma companies, supplying its software and computational services to predict different types of biological phenomena. It had arrangements with big compan...
Elbit Systems Ltd. is an Israel-based international military technology company and defense contractor. Founded in 1966 by Elron, Elbit Systems is the primary provider of the Israeli military's land-based equipment and unmanned aerial vehicles. It is an important company within the defense industry of Israel.
CGEN vs ESLT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.5M | $5.8M |
| Net Profit | $-14.5M | $367.1K |
| Gross Margin | — | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | -475.1% | 8.3% |
| Net Margin | -410.1% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -61.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -54.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | $7.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $0 | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $367.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-18.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -475.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -128.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -410.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -101.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 284.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $7.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $89505618.00 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.21 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $35.3M | $265.4K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $90.7K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $50.3M | $3.3M |
| Total Assets | $106.5M | $11.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $265.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.3M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $21.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $90.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $65.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $62.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.3M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $77.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.6M | $534.6K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.8M | $319.6K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -530.8% | 5.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.5% | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $534.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-18.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $319.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-18.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -530.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 428.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
