vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Community Healthcare Trust Inc (CHCT) and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Community Healthcare Trust Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.9M vs $26.9M, roughly 1.2× Hyperscale Data, Inc.). Community Healthcare Trust Inc runs the higher net margin — 46.6% vs -112.0%, a 158.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyperscale Data, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.4% vs 5.6%). Community Healthcare Trust Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($35.9M vs $-56.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Community Healthcare Trust Inc's revenue compounded faster (2.7% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
CHCT vs GPUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.9M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $14.4M | $-30.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -117.8% |
| Net Margin | 46.6% | -112.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.6% | 38.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 687.6% | -6670.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.52 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30.9M | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.1M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.1M | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.3M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.6M | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.5M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.3M | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | $-30.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.6M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8M | $-445.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.4M | $-33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7M | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 47.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -117.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -46.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -79.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -151.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | 46.6% | -112.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | -53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -43.2% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -37.9% | -190.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.5% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.50 | $-2.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.04 | $-8.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $-24.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $-37.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.11 | $3.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.3M | $13.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $532.2M | $83.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $429.4M | $119.8M |
| Total Assets | $990.8M | $313.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.24× | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.3M | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $734.0K | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | $532.2M | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $530.1M | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $500.1M | $88.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $496.0M | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $486.0M | $96.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $473.7M | $104.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $457.6M | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $442.3M | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | $429.4M | $119.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $426.8M | $55.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.8M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $461.3M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $476.0M | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $477.2M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $497.8M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $511.6M | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | $990.8M | $313.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $987.3M | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $966.3M | $213.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $985.1M | $218.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $992.6M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.8M | $231.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $983.2M | $270.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $982.7M | $299.8M |
| Q4 25 | 1.24× | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.24× | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.14× | 16.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.08× | 14.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | 11.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.99× | 38.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.92× | 4.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.86× | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $56.4M | $-37.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $35.9M | $-56.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 116.0% | -208.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 66.3% | 68.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.91× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $62.8M | $-87.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $56.4M | $-37.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.4M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.6M | $-10.2M |
| Q4 25 | $35.9M | $-56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.7M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.2M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.5M | $-11.6M |
| Q4 25 | 116.0% | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.6% | -84.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.9% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.3% | -27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 116.9% | -47.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.7% | -33.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.7% | -30.3% |
| Q4 25 | 66.3% | 68.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.3% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 84.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.1% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.4% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.91× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.76× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.06× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.45× | -2.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CHCT
Segment breakdown not available.
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
