vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Community Healthcare Trust Inc (CHCT) and WINMARK CORP (WINA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Community Healthcare Trust Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.9M vs $21.1M, roughly 1.5× WINMARK CORP). WINMARK CORP runs the higher net margin — 47.2% vs 46.6%, a 0.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WINMARK CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.9% vs 5.6%). Community Healthcare Trust Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($35.9M vs $8.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Community Healthcare Trust Inc's revenue compounded faster (2.7% CAGR vs 2.4%).

Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...

Winmark Corporation is an American franchisor of five retail businesses that specialize in buying and selling used goods. The company is based in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Winmark was founded in 1988 as Play It Again Sports Franchise Corporation by Ron Olson and Jeffrey Dahlberg after they purchased the Play It Again Sports franchise rights from Martha Morris. They renamed the company to Grow Biz International Inc. in June 1993. Grow Biz went public in August 1993. In 2000, John Morgan replaced...

CHCT vs WINA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CHCT
CHCT
1.5× larger
CHCT
$30.9M
$21.1M
WINA
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
WINA
WINA
+2.2% gap
WINA
7.9%
5.6%
CHCT
Higher net margin
WINA
WINA
0.6% more per $
WINA
47.2%
46.6%
CHCT
More free cash flow
CHCT
CHCT
$27.4M more FCF
CHCT
$35.9M
$8.5M
WINA
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
CHCT
CHCT
Annualised
CHCT
2.7%
2.4%
WINA

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Revenue
$30.9M
$21.1M
Net Profit
$14.4M
$10.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
61.7%
Net Margin
46.6%
47.2%
Revenue YoY
5.6%
7.9%
Net Profit YoY
687.6%
3.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.52
$2.68

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Q4 25
$30.9M
$21.1M
Q3 25
$31.1M
$22.6M
Q2 25
$29.1M
$20.4M
Q1 25
$30.1M
$21.9M
Q4 24
$29.3M
$19.5M
Q3 24
$29.6M
$21.5M
Q2 24
$27.5M
$20.1M
Q1 24
$29.3M
$20.1M
Net Profit
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Q4 25
$14.4M
$10.0M
Q3 25
$1.6M
$11.1M
Q2 25
$-12.6M
$10.6M
Q1 25
$1.6M
$10.0M
Q4 24
$1.8M
$9.6M
Q3 24
$1.7M
$11.1M
Q2 24
$-10.4M
$10.4M
Q1 24
$3.7M
$8.8M
Operating Margin
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Q4 25
61.7%
Q3 25
65.9%
Q2 25
64.0%
Q1 25
62.0%
Q4 24
65.3%
Q3 24
69.4%
Q2 24
64.7%
Q1 24
60.8%
Net Margin
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Q4 25
46.6%
47.2%
Q3 25
5.3%
49.2%
Q2 25
-43.2%
51.9%
Q1 25
5.3%
45.4%
Q4 24
6.3%
49.0%
Q3 24
5.9%
51.7%
Q2 24
-37.9%
51.8%
Q1 24
12.5%
43.9%
EPS (diluted)
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Q4 25
$0.52
$2.68
Q3 25
$0.03
$3.02
Q2 25
$-0.50
$2.89
Q1 25
$0.03
$2.71
Q4 24
$0.04
$2.60
Q3 24
$0.04
$3.03
Q2 24
$-0.42
$2.85
Q1 24
$0.11
$2.41

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$3.3M
$10.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$532.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$429.4M
$-53.7M
Total Assets
$990.8M
$24.9M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.24×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Q4 25
$3.3M
$10.3M
Q3 25
$3.4M
$39.7M
Q2 25
$4.9M
$28.8M
Q1 25
$2.3M
$21.8M
Q4 24
$4.4M
$12.2M
Q3 24
$2.8M
$37.2M
Q2 24
$734.0K
$29.4M
Q1 24
$3.8M
$22.9M
Total Debt
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Q4 25
$532.2M
Q3 25
$530.1M
Q2 25
$500.1M
Q1 25
$496.0M
Q4 24
$486.0M
Q3 24
$473.7M
Q2 24
$457.6M
Q1 24
$442.3M
Stockholders' Equity
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Q4 25
$429.4M
$-53.7M
Q3 25
$426.8M
$-26.3M
Q2 25
$437.8M
$-36.8M
Q1 25
$461.3M
$-45.9M
Q4 24
$476.0M
$-51.0M
Q3 24
$477.2M
$-33.7M
Q2 24
$497.8M
$-42.2M
Q1 24
$511.6M
$-52.6M
Total Assets
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Q4 25
$990.8M
$24.9M
Q3 25
$987.3M
$53.7M
Q2 25
$966.3M
$43.2M
Q1 25
$985.1M
$37.1M
Q4 24
$992.6M
$26.8M
Q3 24
$981.8M
$52.0M
Q2 24
$983.2M
$44.7M
Q1 24
$982.7M
$38.3M
Debt / Equity
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Q4 25
1.24×
Q3 25
1.24×
Q2 25
1.14×
Q1 25
1.08×
Q4 24
1.02×
Q3 24
0.99×
Q2 24
0.92×
Q1 24
0.86×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$56.4M
$8.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$35.9M
$8.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
116.0%
40.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
66.3%
0.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.91×
0.86×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$62.8M
$44.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Q4 25
$56.4M
$8.5M
Q3 25
$12.7M
$12.3M
Q2 25
$13.8M
$9.0M
Q1 25
$14.4M
$15.1M
Q4 24
$58.9M
$8.5M
Q3 24
$13.8M
$12.1M
Q2 24
$16.7M
$8.2M
Q1 24
$12.6M
$13.4M
Free Cash Flow
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Q4 25
$35.9M
$8.5M
Q3 25
$7.6M
$12.2M
Q2 25
$9.6M
$9.0M
Q1 25
$9.7M
$15.0M
Q4 24
$34.2M
Q3 24
$6.7M
$12.1M
Q2 24
$9.5M
$8.1M
Q1 24
$7.5M
$13.3M
FCF Margin
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Q4 25
116.0%
40.3%
Q3 25
24.6%
53.8%
Q2 25
32.9%
44.0%
Q1 25
32.3%
68.6%
Q4 24
116.9%
Q3 24
22.5%
56.3%
Q2 24
34.7%
40.4%
Q1 24
25.7%
66.0%
Capex Intensity
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Q4 25
66.3%
0.1%
Q3 25
16.3%
0.3%
Q2 25
14.5%
0.3%
Q1 25
15.6%
0.2%
Q4 24
84.1%
0.0%
Q3 24
24.2%
0.0%
Q2 24
26.1%
0.5%
Q1 24
17.4%
0.4%
Cash Conversion
CHCT
CHCT
WINA
WINA
Q4 25
3.91×
0.86×
Q3 25
7.76×
1.10×
Q2 25
0.85×
Q1 25
9.06×
1.51×
Q4 24
32.14×
0.88×
Q3 24
7.92×
1.09×
Q2 24
0.79×
Q1 24
3.45×
1.52×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons