vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Churchill Downs Inc (CHDN) and Ralliant Corp (RAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Churchill Downs Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($663.0M vs $529.1M, roughly 1.3× Ralliant Corp). Churchill Downs Inc runs the higher net margin — 12.5% vs 7.5%, a 5.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Churchill Downs Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.1% vs -0.5%).
Churchill Downs Incorporated is the parent company of Churchill Downs. The company has evolved from one racetrack in Louisville, Kentucky, to a multi American-state-wide, publicly traded company with racetracks, casinos and an online wagering company among its portfolio of businesses.
CHDN vs RAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $663.0M | $529.1M |
| Net Profit | $83.0M | $39.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 50.8% |
| Operating Margin | 21.6% | 9.8% |
| Net Margin | 12.5% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.1% | -0.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | -56.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.16 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $663.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $665.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $683.0M | $529.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $934.4M | $503.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $642.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $624.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $531.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $890.7M | $533.7M |
| Q1 26 | $83.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.1M | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.9M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.4M | $90.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $209.3M | $64.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 49.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 51.5% |
| Q1 26 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.1% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.0% | 19.7% |
| Q1 26 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.5% | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | $1.16 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $200.0M | $264.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $840.0M | $1.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $3.0B |
| Total Assets | $7.5B | $5.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.39× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $180.5M | $264.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $182.4M | $198.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $175.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $152.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | $840.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $295.0M | $138.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $126.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 23.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.55× | 3.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $295.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $187.7M | $138.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $246.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $166.3M | $126.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $233.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $154.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.55× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.93× | 3.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.59× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CHDN
| Live and Historical Racing | $297.0M | 45% |
| Gaming | $257.0M | 39% |
| Wagering Services and Solutions | $109.0M | 16% |
RAL
| Industrial Manufacturing | $111.1M | 21% |
| Defense And Space | $93.6M | 18% |
| Diversified Electronics | $91.0M | 17% |
| Test And Measurement | $76.8M | 15% |
| Communications | $60.7M | 11% |
| Semiconductors | $51.4M | 10% |
| Other Direct End Markets | $44.4M | 8% |
