vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD (CHKP) and Intuit (INTU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Intuit is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.9B vs $2.0B, roughly 2.0× CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD). CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD runs the higher net margin — 38.0% vs 11.5%, a 26.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD produced more free cash flow last quarter ($895.5M vs $599.0M).
Check Point Software Technologies is an Israeli cybersecurity company with operations in over 60 countries. Its headquarters are located in Tel Aviv, Israel, and the company maintains a significant presence in Redwood City, California, United States. The company protects over 100,000 organizations globally and is home to the Check Point Research team. It is a partner organization of the World Economic Forum.
IntuitINTUEarnings & Financial Report
Intuit Inc. is an American multinational business software company that specializes in financial software. Headquartered in Mountain View, California, the company is led by CEO Sasan Goodarzi. Intuit's products include the tax preparation application TurboTax, the small business accounting software QuickBooks, the credit monitoring and personal finance service Credit Karma, and the email marketing platform Mailchimp. As of 2019, more than 95% of its revenue and earnings originated from its op...
CHKP vs INTU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $3.9B |
| Net Profit | $752.4M | $446.0M |
| Gross Margin | 86.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 30.2% | 13.7% |
| Net Margin | 38.0% | 11.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 18.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 126.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $6.81 | $1.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $446.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $752.4M | $381.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $471.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $353.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 86.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.2% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 46.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.81 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $619.9M | $3.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $6.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.1B | $19.3B |
| Total Assets | $5.7B | $33.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $619.9M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $19.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | $33.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $37.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $36.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $31.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $33.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $31.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $29.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $914.9M | $637.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $895.5M | $599.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 45.2% | 15.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.22× | 1.43× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $6.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $637.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $914.9M | $381.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $362.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $417.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $613.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $599.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $895.5M | $366.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $329.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $400.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $550.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 56.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.22× | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.84× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.74× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CHKP
| Security subscriptions | $812.0M | 41% |
| Software updates and maintenance | $712.0M | 36% |
| Products and licenses | $337.3M | 17% |
| Other | $119.2M | 6% |
INTU
| Quick Books Online Accounting | $1.2B | 32% |
| Product And Other | $779.0M | 20% |
| Credit Karma | $616.0M | 16% |
| Turbo Tax | $581.0M | 15% |
| Quick Books Desktop Accounting | $408.0M | 11% |
| Pro Tax | $290.0M | 7% |
