vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD (CHKP) and NetEase, Inc. (NTES). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NetEase, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.0B vs $2.0B, roughly 2.0× CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD). CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD runs the higher net margin — 38.0% vs 31.0%, a 7.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. NetEase, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.8B vs $895.5M).
Check Point Software Technologies is an Israeli cybersecurity company with operations in over 60 countries. Its headquarters are located in Tel Aviv, Israel, and the company maintains a significant presence in Redwood City, California, United States. The company protects over 100,000 organizations globally and is home to the Check Point Research team. It is a partner organization of the World Economic Forum.
NetEase, Inc. is a Chinese developer and publisher of online PC and mobile games, advertising services, email services, and e-commerce platforms. It is one of the largest Internet and video game companies in the world and was founded by Ding Lei in June 1997.
CHKP vs NTES — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $4.0B |
| Net Profit | $752.4M | $1.2B |
| Gross Margin | 86.7% | 64.1% |
| Operating Margin | 30.2% | 28.3% |
| Net Margin | 38.0% | 31.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $6.81 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $3.3B |
| Q3 25 | $752.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $955.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $939.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.1B |
| Q3 25 | 86.7% | 64.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 64.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 64.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 62.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 62.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 63.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 62.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 59.9% |
| Q3 25 | 30.2% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 32.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 27.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 25.2% |
| Q3 25 | 38.0% | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 32.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 34.0% |
| Q3 25 | $6.81 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $619.9M | $31.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.1B | $160.8B |
| Total Assets | $5.7B | $214.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $619.9M | $31.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $54.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $41.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $43.0B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $15.1B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $12.8B |
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $160.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $154.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $147.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $135.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $134.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $130.5B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $123.8B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $118.1B |
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $214.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $208.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $200.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $184.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $183.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $195.1B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $171.6B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $167.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $914.9M | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $895.5M | $1.8B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 45.2% | 44.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.22× | 1.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $6.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $914.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $898.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.1B |
| Q3 25 | $895.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $875.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $987.1M |
| Q3 25 | 45.2% | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 29.8% |
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 2.2% |
| Q3 25 | 1.22× | 1.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 0.94× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CHKP
| Security subscriptions | $812.0M | 41% |
| Software updates and maintenance | $712.0M | 36% |
| Products and licenses | $337.3M | 17% |
| Other | $119.2M | 6% |
NTES
| Games and related value-added services | $3.3B | 82% |
| NetEase Cloud Music | $275.9M | 7% |
| Youdao | $228.8M | 6% |
| Innovative businesses and others | $202.1M | 5% |