vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD (CHKP) and JBT Marel Corp (JBTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.0B, roughly 2.0× JBT Marel Corp). CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD runs the higher net margin — 38.0% vs 5.3%, a 32.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD produced more free cash flow last quarter ($895.5M vs $83.5M).
Check Point Software Technologies is an Israeli cybersecurity company with operations in over 60 countries. Its headquarters are located in Tel Aviv, Israel, and the company maintains a significant presence in Redwood City, California, United States. The company protects over 100,000 organizations globally and is home to the Check Point Research team. It is a partner organization of the World Economic Forum.
JBT Marel Corporation, formerly known as JBT Corporation, or John Bean Technologies Corporation, is a food processing machinery and automated vehicle company. The company was incorporated in 2008 when FMC Technologies divested its non-energy businesses. The company is based in Chicago, Illinois and traces its history back to a company founded in 1884 by John Bean, an orchardist in Los Gatos, California.
CHKP vs JBTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | $752.4M | $53.1M |
| Gross Margin | 86.7% | 34.5% |
| Operating Margin | 30.2% | 7.2% |
| Net Margin | 38.0% | 5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 115.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 858.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $6.81 | $1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $934.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $854.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $467.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $453.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $402.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $392.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $53.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $752.4M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-173.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $38.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $22.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 86.7% | 35.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.2% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.0% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.81 | $1.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $619.9M | $167.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.1B | $4.5B |
| Total Assets | $5.7B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $167.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $619.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $648.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $647.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $647.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.43× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $914.9M | $117.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $895.5M | $83.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 45.2% | 8.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.22× | 2.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $117.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $914.9M | $87.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $102.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $128.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $71.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $895.5M | $56.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $83.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $65.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-100.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.2% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.22× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CHKP
| Security subscriptions | $812.0M | 41% |
| Software updates and maintenance | $712.0M | 36% |
| Products and licenses | $337.3M | 17% |
| Other | $119.2M | 6% |
JBTM
Segment breakdown not available.