vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHEMUNG FINANCIAL CORP (CHMG) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHEMUNG FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.8M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.8× Laird Superfood, Inc.). CHEMUNG FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 32.5% vs -13.2%, a 45.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CHEMUNG FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.3% vs 15.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 0.2%).
Chemung Canal Trust Company is a New York State chartered trust company based in Elmira, New York. It was founded as a publicly traded bank in 1833.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
CHMG vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.8M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $7.7M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | 46.1% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 32.5% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.3% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.9% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.61 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.7M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.9M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.3M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.4M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.7M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $7.7M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.5M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | 46.1% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.0% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -87.2% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.0% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.8% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.3% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 32.5% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -63.9% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.8% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.7% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.61 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.62 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.35 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.26 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.24 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.48 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $50.1M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $254.7M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $50.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.6M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.1M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.4M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.0M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.4M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.2M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $94.9M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $254.7M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.3M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $235.0M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $228.3M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $215.3M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $220.7M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $201.2M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $197.1M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.5M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $43.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 183.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.88× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $71.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.5M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $43.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 183.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 92.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 101.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.88× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CHMG
Segment breakdown not available.
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
