vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Coherus Oncology, Inc. (CHRS) and Lakeside Holding Ltd (LSH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Coherus Oncology, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.7M vs $7.0M, roughly 1.8× Lakeside Holding Ltd). Lakeside Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — -22.6% vs -295.3%, a 272.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Lakeside Holding Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (95.0% vs 64.9%).

Coherus Oncology, Inc. is a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing, manufacturing and commercializing affordable oncology treatments, including FDA-approved biosimilars and novel targeted immuno-oncology therapies. Its core market is North America, serving patients with solid tumors and hematological malignancies to expand access to life-saving cancer care.

Lakeside Press was a Chicago publishing imprint under which the RR Donnelley Company produced fine books as well as mail order catalogs, telephone directories, encyclopedias, and advertising. The Press was best known for its high quality editions for the Chicago Caxton Club as well as the Lakeside Classics, a series of fine reprints.

CHRS vs LSH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CHRS
CHRS
1.8× larger
CHRS
$12.7M
$7.0M
LSH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LSH
LSH
+30.2% gap
LSH
95.0%
64.9%
CHRS
Higher net margin
LSH
LSH
272.7% more per $
LSH
-22.6%
-295.3%
CHRS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Revenue
$12.7M
$7.0M
Net Profit
$-37.6M
$-1.6M
Gross Margin
68.3%
27.2%
Operating Margin
-359.9%
-21.3%
Net Margin
-295.3%
-22.6%
Revenue YoY
64.9%
95.0%
Net Profit YoY
25.7%
18.7%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.34
$-0.08

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
$12.7M
$7.0M
Q3 25
$11.6M
$6.1M
Q2 25
$10.3M
$6.3M
Q1 25
$3.8M
Q4 24
$3.6M
Q3 24
$4.1M
Q2 24
$10.3M
Q3 23
$74.6M
Net Profit
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
$-37.6M
$-1.6M
Q3 25
$-35.5M
$-1.4M
Q2 25
$297.8M
$-893.1K
Q1 25
$-1.1M
Q4 24
$-1.9M
Q3 24
$-1.3M
Q2 24
$-12.9M
Q3 23
$-39.6M
Gross Margin
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
68.3%
27.2%
Q3 25
67.8%
18.2%
Q2 25
66.9%
26.7%
Q1 25
18.8%
Q4 24
-1.2%
Q3 24
12.8%
Q2 24
82.4%
Q3 23
56.1%
Operating Margin
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
-359.9%
-21.3%
Q3 25
-383.1%
-20.8%
Q2 25
-443.6%
-8.9%
Q1 25
-28.2%
Q4 24
-55.6%
Q3 24
-32.5%
Q2 24
-384.9%
Q3 23
-42.9%
Net Margin
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
-295.3%
-22.6%
Q3 25
-307.1%
-22.2%
Q2 25
2903.9%
-14.2%
Q1 25
-28.2%
Q4 24
-54.1%
Q3 24
-32.7%
Q2 24
-125.5%
Q3 23
-53.2%
EPS (diluted)
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
$-0.34
$-0.08
Q3 25
$-0.31
$-0.09
Q2 25
$2.57
$-0.11
Q1 25
$-0.14
Q4 24
$-0.26
Q3 24
$-0.18
Q2 24
$-0.11
Q3 23
$-0.41

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$172.1M
$1.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$61.0M
$12.2M
Total Assets
$258.3M
$24.3M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.20×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
$172.1M
$1.6M
Q3 25
$191.7M
$4.5M
Q2 25
$237.6M
$5.0M
Q1 25
$1.5M
Q4 24
$1.1M
Q3 24
$2.7M
Q2 24
$159.2M
Q3 23
$131.1M
Total Debt
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
$2.4M
Q3 25
$2.4M
Q2 25
$1.4M
Q1 25
$774.2K
Q4 24
$784.8K
Q3 24
$589.9K
Q2 24
Q3 23
Stockholders' Equity
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
$61.0M
$12.2M
Q3 25
$87.8M
$7.0M
Q2 25
$119.8M
$2.8M
Q1 25
$749.8K
Q4 24
$1.6M
Q3 24
$3.6M
Q2 24
$-84.1M
Q3 23
$-133.6M
Total Assets
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
$258.3M
$24.3M
Q3 25
$516.5M
$18.6M
Q2 25
$439.5M
$14.4M
Q1 25
$9.9M
Q4 24
$9.8M
Q3 24
$10.8M
Q2 24
$674.9M
Q3 23
$583.8M
Debt / Equity
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
0.20×
Q3 25
0.35×
Q2 25
0.48×
Q1 25
1.03×
Q4 24
0.48×
Q3 24
0.16×
Q2 24
Q3 23

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-19.7M
$-453.5K
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
$-19.7M
$-453.5K
Q3 25
$-46.3M
$-4.0M
Q2 25
$-46.6M
$-483.7K
Q1 25
$-238.3K
Q4 24
$-530.2K
Q3 24
$-1.4M
Q2 24
$59.7M
Q3 23
$-54.3M
Free Cash Flow
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
$-497.4K
Q1 25
Q4 24
$-560.5K
Q3 24
$-1.4M
Q2 24
Q3 23
FCF Margin
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
-7.9%
Q1 25
Q4 24
-15.6%
Q3 24
-34.5%
Q2 24
Q3 23
Capex Intensity
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
0.2%
Q1 25
0.0%
Q4 24
0.8%
Q3 24
0.1%
Q2 24
Q3 23
0.0%
Cash Conversion
CHRS
CHRS
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
-0.16×
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q3 23

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CHRS
CHRS

Toripalimab$12.4M97%
Other$388.0K3%

LSH
LSH

Transferred Over Time$4.6M65%
Distribution Of Pharmaceutical Products$2.4M35%

Related Comparisons