vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of C.H. Robinson (CHRW) and CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
C.H. Robinson is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.9B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.8× CONSTELLIUM SE). CONSTELLIUM SE runs the higher net margin — 5.1% vs 3.5%, a 1.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. C.H. Robinson produced more free cash flow last quarter ($302.4M vs $109.0M).
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. is an American transportation company that includes third-party logistics (3PL). The company offers freight transportation, transportation management, brokerage and warehousing. It offers truckload, less than truckload, air freight, intermodal, and ocean transportation.
Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.
CHRW vs CSTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9B | $2.2B |
| Net Profit | $136.3M | $112.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | 7.5% |
| Net Margin | 3.5% | 5.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -6.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -8.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.12 | $0.79 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $136.3M | $112.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $163.0M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.5M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.3M | $37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.3M | $76.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.12 | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.34 | $0.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.26 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.80 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $0.51 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.78 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $160.9M | $120.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $952.0M |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.59× | 2.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $160.9M | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.8M | $122.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $156.0M | $133.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $129.9M | $118.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $113.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $952.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $845.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $780.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $745.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $796.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | 2.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.64× | 2.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.76× | 2.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.80× | 2.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.19× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $305.4M | $218.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $302.4M | $109.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.7% | 5.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 5.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.24× | 1.95× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $894.9M | $159.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $305.4M | $218.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $275.4M | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $227.1M | $114.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $106.5M | $58.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $267.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $166.4M | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-33.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $302.4M | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $269.5M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $219.8M | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.2M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $265.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $103.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.8M | $54.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-41.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.24× | 1.95× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.69× | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.49× | 3.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.79× | 1.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.79× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.32× | 1.82× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.36× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CHRW
| North American Service Transportation NAST | $2.8B | 72% |
| Global Forwarding | $731.0M | 19% |
| Sourcing | $340.9M | 9% |
CSTM
| Packaging Rolled Products | $1.0B | 46% |
| Automotive Rolled Products | $318.0M | 14% |
| Aerospace Rolled Products | $270.0M | 12% |
| Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products | $232.0M | 11% |
| Automotive Extruded Products | $220.0M | 10% |
| Other Extruded Products | $132.0M | 6% |
| Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products | $22.0M | 1% |
