vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Chanson International Holding (CHSN) and Kura Oncology, Inc. (KURA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kura Oncology, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($17.3M vs $8.7M, roughly 2.0× Chanson International Holding).

Chanson International Holding is a food and beverage enterprise focused on operating premium bakery chains primarily across mainland China. Its product portfolio includes freshly baked bread, handcrafted pastries, custom celebration cakes, specialty beverages, and frozen bakery goods supplied to partnered retail outlets, catering to middle-class consumers with demand for high-quality daily food options.

Kura Sushi, Inc. is a Japanese conveyor belt sushi restaurant chain. It is the second largest sushi restaurant chain in Japan, behind Sushiro and ahead of Hama Sushi. Its headquarters are in Sakai, Osaka Prefecture. It has 543 locations in Japan, 56 in Taiwan, and 69 in the United States.

CHSN vs KURA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KURA
KURA
2.0× larger
KURA
$17.3M
$8.7M
CHSN

Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Revenue
$8.7M
$17.3M
Net Profit
$-1.0M
Gross Margin
44.5%
Operating Margin
-13.7%
-497.6%
Net Margin
-12.1%
Revenue YoY
15.2%
Net Profit YoY
-4579.7%
EPS (diluted)
$-2.87
$-0.92

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Q4 25
$17.3M
Q3 25
$20.8M
Q2 25
$8.7M
$15.3M
Q1 25
$14.1M
Q2 24
$7.5M
Net Profit
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Q4 25
Q3 25
$-74.1M
Q2 25
$-1.0M
$-66.1M
Q1 25
$-57.4M
Q2 24
$23.4K
Gross Margin
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
44.5%
Q1 25
Q2 24
41.5%
Operating Margin
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Q4 25
-497.6%
Q3 25
-385.5%
Q2 25
-13.7%
-475.3%
Q1 25
-458.6%
Q2 24
-7.4%
Net Margin
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Q4 25
Q3 25
-357.2%
Q2 25
-12.1%
-432.5%
Q1 25
-407.1%
Q2 24
0.3%
EPS (diluted)
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Q4 25
$-0.92
Q3 25
$-0.85
Q2 25
$-2.87
$-0.75
Q1 25
$-0.66
Q2 24
$0.15

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$22.1M
$149.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$4.5M
$9.7M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$24.5M
$174.1M
Total Assets
$51.6M
$738.4M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.18×
0.06×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Q4 25
$149.1M
Q3 25
$95.3M
Q2 25
$22.1M
$81.9M
Q1 25
$51.3M
Q2 24
$4.1M
Total Debt
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Q4 25
$9.7M
Q3 25
Q2 25
$4.5M
Q1 25
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Q4 25
$174.1M
Q3 25
$242.5M
Q2 25
$24.5M
$305.5M
Q1 25
$364.4M
Q2 24
$12.1M
Total Assets
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Q4 25
$738.4M
Q3 25
$649.4M
Q2 25
$51.6M
$682.4M
Q1 25
$743.8M
Q2 24
$38.7M
Debt / Equity
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Q4 25
0.06×
Q3 25
Q2 25
0.18×
Q1 25
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-390.3K
$117.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$115.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
663.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
13.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-70.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Q4 25
$117.3M
Q3 25
$-80.6M
Q2 25
$-390.3K
$-28.8M
Q1 25
$-71.9M
Q2 24
$806.1K
Free Cash Flow
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Q4 25
$115.0M
Q3 25
$-83.2M
Q2 25
$-30.2M
Q1 25
$-72.2M
Q2 24
$771.9K
FCF Margin
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Q4 25
663.1%
Q3 25
-400.9%
Q2 25
-197.8%
Q1 25
-511.9%
Q2 24
10.2%
Capex Intensity
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Q4 25
13.4%
Q3 25
12.4%
Q2 25
9.5%
Q1 25
2.1%
Q2 24
0.5%
Cash Conversion
CHSN
CHSN
KURA
KURA
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q2 24
34.43×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons