vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHIMERA INVESTMENT CORP (CIM) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.7M vs $66.2M, roughly 1.4× CHIMERA INVESTMENT CORP). On growth, Ranpak Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.3% vs 0.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 0.8%).
Chimera Investment Corp is a US-based real estate investment trust (REIT) primarily investing in residential mortgage-backed securities, residential and commercial mortgage loans, and other real estate-related financial assets. It delivers sustainable risk-adjusted returns for shareholders via regular dividend distributions from its investment portfolio.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
CIM vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $66.2M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $28.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 42.6% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 42.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 0.5% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 119.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $66.2M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.0M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $66.0M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.2M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.8M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.5M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.3M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $65.1M | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | $28.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-580.0K | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $167.3M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-146.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.5M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.7M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $129.5M | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | 42.6% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.5% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.3% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -222.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 84.2% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | 42.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.7% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 241.7% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -222.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 205.4% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 84.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 198.8% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.77 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.06 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.39 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.36 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $278.6M | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $251.5M | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $15.8B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.10× | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $278.6M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $491.5M | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $250.2M | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.3M | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.3M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.3M | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $169.0M | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | $251.5M | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $251.0M | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.2M | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $134.9M | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.6M | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.4M | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.4M | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | $15.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.5B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.10× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.10× | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.05× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.05× | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.02× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-248.9M | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -8.78× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-248.9M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-137.5M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.4M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $205.7M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.4M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.0M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.3M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | -8.78× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.21× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.22× | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.44× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CIM
Segment breakdown not available.
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
