vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CISO Global, Inc. (CISO) and ETHZilla Corp (ETHZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CISO Global, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.3M vs $4.1M, roughly 1.5× ETHZilla Corp). CISO Global, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -35.4% vs -5273.3%, a 5237.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
CISO Global, Inc. is a specialized cybersecurity services provider. It offers managed security monitoring, risk assessment, compliance advisory and incident response, serving North American SMEs, government and commercial clients across healthcare, retail and finance to help safeguard digital assets and mitigate cyber risks.
CISO vs ETHZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.3M | $4.1M |
| Net Profit | $-2.2M | $-216.7M |
| Gross Margin | 28.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -33.7% | -5364.6% |
| Net Margin | -35.4% | -5273.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -15.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 59.8% | -25803.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | $-16.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $-216.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | $-836.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -33.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -40.8% | -5364.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -34.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -23.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -46.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -54.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -61.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -35.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.2% | -5273.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -44.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -75.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -74.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -49.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -108.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -82.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $-16.80 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.38 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.47 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.32 | $-5.43 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.69 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.55 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.7M | $62.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.8M | $445.1M |
| Total Assets | $25.0M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $62.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $760.8K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $992.6K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $443.1K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $14.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3M | $445.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $25.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.6M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.20× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.27× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.35× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.8M | $-16.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-259.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -6323.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5923.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-876.7K | $-16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-259.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-903.1K | $-239.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-259.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6323.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5923.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CISO
| Security Managed Services | $5.4M | 87% |
| Other | $823.3K | 13% |
ETHZ
Segment breakdown not available.
