vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of General Enterprise Ventures, Inc. (CITR) and Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
General Enterprise Ventures, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($288.2K vs $198.0K, roughly 1.5× Quantum Computing Inc.). Quantum Computing Inc. runs the higher net margin — -785.9% vs -2751.2%, a 1965.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Quantum Computing Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (219.4% vs 169.3%). General Enterprise Ventures, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.5M vs $-12.2M). Over the past eight quarters, General Enterprise Ventures, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (218.8% CAGR vs 99.0%).
The Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) is an American multinational information technology company based in Spring, Texas. It is a business-focused organization which works in servers, storage, networking, containerization software and consulting and support. HPE was ranked No. 107 in the 2018 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue.
Rigetti Computing, Inc. is a Berkeley, California-based developer of superconducting quantum integrated circuits used for quantum computers. Rigetti also develops a cloud platform called Forest that enables programmers to write quantum algorithms.
CITR vs QUBT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $288.2K | $198.0K |
| Net Profit | $-7.9M | $-1.6M |
| Gross Margin | -99.7% | -49.5% |
| Operating Margin | -1470.3% | -11220.2% |
| Net Margin | -2751.2% | -785.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 169.3% | 219.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1110.1% | 97.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.59 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $198.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $288.2K | $384.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $687.6K | $61.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $969.4K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $62.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $101.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $198.7K | $183.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $433.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.9M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.9M | $-36.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-907.4K | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -99.7% | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.0% | 42.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 54.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.6% | 31.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 79.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -11220.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1470.3% | -2709.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -438.8% | -16673.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -356.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14375.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5384.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -456.7% | -2878.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -608.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -785.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2751.2% | 620.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1731.1% | -59806.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1124.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -82640.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5618.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -456.7% | -2838.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -812.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.59 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.53 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.5M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $12.3M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $555.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $348.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $78.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | $877.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $396.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $107.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $60.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.3M | $898.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | $426.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $153.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $76.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $76.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.5M | $-11.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.5M | $-12.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -525.6% | -6147.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 18.7% | 583.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-37.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-713.9K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-424.9K | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-343.7K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-740.9K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -6147.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -525.6% | -3000.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -196.7% | -11683.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -76.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -10709.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5040.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2782.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 583.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.7% | 723.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.5% | 1678.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4622.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 508.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 588.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.67× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
