vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC. (CIVB) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($47.3M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.2× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs -19.9%, a 51.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (11.3% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Civista Bancshares, Inc. is a US-based bank holding company operating primarily across the Midwest region. It provides a full suite of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, mortgage, consumer and commercial lending products, as well as wealth management solutions, serving retail consumers, small and medium-sized local businesses and community client segments.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
CIVB vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $47.3M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $15.0M | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 47.4% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $47.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.3M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.2M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.4M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.6M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.4M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.3M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.1M | $46.4M |
| Q1 26 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $-13.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.8% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.4% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.1% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.2% | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | -12.3% |
| Q1 26 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.0% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.3% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.5% | -28.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.59 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.68 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.66 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.62 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.53 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.45 | $-0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $553.9M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $162.5M |
| Q1 26 | $553.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $543.5M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $499.0M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.1M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $397.4M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.5M | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.4M | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $373.8M | $305.8M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $412.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.3M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.2M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.2M | $-1.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.1M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 90.9% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 109.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.73× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CIVB
| Net Interest Income | $37.8M | 80% |
| Noninterest Income | $9.4M | 20% |
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |