vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC. (CIVB) and Ouster, Inc. (OUST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ouster, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.2M vs $47.3M, roughly 1.3× CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC.). Over the past eight quarters, Ouster, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (54.8% CAGR vs 11.3%).
Civista Bancshares, Inc. is a US-based bank holding company operating primarily across the Midwest region. It provides a full suite of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, mortgage, consumer and commercial lending products, as well as wealth management solutions, serving retail consumers, small and medium-sized local businesses and community client segments.
Ouster, Inc. is an American lidar technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It builds high-resolution, digital 3D lidar sensors for use in autonomous vehicles, industrial, robotics, drones, mapping, defense, and security systems.
CIVB vs OUST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $47.3M | $62.2M |
| Net Profit | $15.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 106.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 47.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $47.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.3M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.2M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.4M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.6M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.4M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.3M | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.1M | $27.0M |
| Q1 26 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $-23.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.4% | -61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.1% | -76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | -73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.2% | -85.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | -98.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | -93.6% |
| Q1 26 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | -55.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.6% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.0% | -67.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.3% | -91.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.5% | -88.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.59 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.68 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.66 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.62 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.53 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.45 | $-0.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $208.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $553.9M | $261.7M |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $349.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $208.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $244.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $226.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $168.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $184.2M |
| Q1 26 | $553.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $543.5M | $261.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $499.0M | $247.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.1M | $221.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $397.4M | $167.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.5M | $180.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.4M | $171.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $373.8M | $170.6M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $349.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $353.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $321.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $268.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $276.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $255.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $309.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-15.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-37.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -59.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 35.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-64.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.3M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $-18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.2M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.2M | $-21.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.1M | $-37.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-22.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 90.9% | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -50.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | -16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 109.1% | -13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -81.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.73× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CIVB
| Net Interest Income | $37.8M | 80% |
| Noninterest Income | $9.4M | 20% |
OUST
Segment breakdown not available.
