vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Colgate-Palmolive (CL) and W. W. Grainger (GWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Colgate-Palmolive is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.2B vs $4.4B, roughly 1.2× W. W. Grainger). W. W. Grainger runs the higher net margin — 10.2% vs -0.7%, a 10.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Colgate-Palmolive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.8% vs 4.5%). Colgate-Palmolive produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.3B vs $269.0M). Over the past eight quarters, W. W. Grainger's revenue compounded faster (2.2% CAGR vs 1.6%).

The Colgate-Palmolive Company, commonly known as Colgate-Palmolive, is an American multinational consumer products company headquartered on Park Avenue in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. The company specializes in the production, distribution, and provision of household, health care, personal care, and veterinary products.

W. W. Grainger, Inc. is an American Fortune 500 industrial supply company founded in 1927 in Chicago by the company's namesake William W. (Bill) Grainger. He founded the company to provide consumers with access to a consistent supply of motors. The company now serves more than 4.5 million customers worldwide with offerings such as motors, lighting, material handling, fasteners, plumbing, tools, and safety supplies, along with inventory management services and technical support.

CL vs GWW — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CL
CL
1.2× larger
CL
$5.2B
$4.4B
GWW
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CL
CL
+1.2% gap
CL
5.8%
4.5%
GWW
Higher net margin
GWW
GWW
10.9% more per $
GWW
10.2%
-0.7%
CL
More free cash flow
CL
CL
$1.0B more FCF
CL
$1.3B
$269.0M
GWW
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GWW
GWW
Annualised
GWW
2.2%
1.6%
CL

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Revenue
$5.2B
$4.4B
Net Profit
$-36.0M
$451.0M
Gross Margin
60.2%
39.5%
Operating Margin
1.7%
14.3%
Net Margin
-0.7%
10.2%
Revenue YoY
5.8%
4.5%
Net Profit YoY
-104.9%
-5.1%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.04
$9.45

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Q4 25
$5.2B
$4.4B
Q3 25
$5.1B
$4.7B
Q2 25
$5.1B
$4.6B
Q1 25
$4.9B
$4.3B
Q4 24
$4.9B
$4.2B
Q3 24
$5.0B
$4.4B
Q2 24
$5.1B
$4.3B
Q1 24
$5.1B
$4.2B
Net Profit
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Q4 25
$-36.0M
$451.0M
Q3 25
$735.0M
$294.0M
Q2 25
$743.0M
$482.0M
Q1 25
$690.0M
$479.0M
Q4 24
$738.0M
$475.0M
Q3 24
$737.0M
$486.0M
Q2 24
$731.0M
$470.0M
Q1 24
$683.0M
$478.0M
Gross Margin
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Q4 25
60.2%
39.5%
Q3 25
59.4%
38.6%
Q2 25
60.1%
38.5%
Q1 25
60.8%
39.7%
Q4 24
60.3%
39.6%
Q3 24
61.1%
39.2%
Q2 24
60.6%
39.3%
Q1 24
60.0%
39.4%
Operating Margin
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Q4 25
1.7%
14.3%
Q3 25
20.6%
11.0%
Q2 25
21.1%
14.9%
Q1 25
21.9%
15.6%
Q4 24
21.5%
15.0%
Q3 24
21.2%
15.6%
Q2 24
21.6%
15.1%
Q1 24
20.7%
15.8%
Net Margin
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Q4 25
-0.7%
10.2%
Q3 25
14.3%
6.3%
Q2 25
14.5%
10.6%
Q1 25
14.1%
11.1%
Q4 24
14.9%
11.2%
Q3 24
14.6%
11.1%
Q2 24
14.5%
10.9%
Q1 24
13.5%
11.3%
EPS (diluted)
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Q4 25
$-0.04
$9.45
Q3 25
$0.91
$6.12
Q2 25
$0.91
$9.97
Q1 25
$0.85
$9.86
Q4 24
$0.89
$9.71
Q3 24
$0.90
$9.87
Q2 24
$0.89
$9.51
Q1 24
$0.83
$9.62

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.4B
$585.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.8B
$2.5B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$54.0M
$3.7B
Total Assets
$16.3B
$9.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
145.17×
0.67×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Q4 25
$1.4B
$585.0M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$535.0M
Q2 25
$1.2B
$597.0M
Q1 25
$1.1B
$666.0M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$1.0B
Q3 24
$1.2B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.1B
$769.0M
Q1 24
$1.1B
$804.0M
Total Debt
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Q4 25
$7.8B
$2.5B
Q3 25
$2.4B
Q2 25
$2.3B
Q1 25
$2.3B
Q4 24
$7.0B
$2.8B
Q3 24
$2.3B
Q2 24
$1.8B
Q1 24
$1.8B
Stockholders' Equity
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Q4 25
$54.0M
$3.7B
Q3 25
$856.0M
$3.6B
Q2 25
$702.0M
$3.7B
Q1 25
$363.0M
$3.5B
Q4 24
$212.0M
$3.4B
Q3 24
$435.0M
$3.5B
Q2 24
$123.0M
$3.3B
Q1 24
$230.0M
$3.2B
Total Assets
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Q4 25
$16.3B
$9.0B
Q3 25
$17.5B
$8.8B
Q2 25
$17.5B
$8.9B
Q1 25
$16.6B
$8.7B
Q4 24
$16.0B
$8.8B
Q3 24
$16.8B
$9.1B
Q2 24
$16.5B
$8.4B
Q1 24
$16.6B
$8.4B
Debt / Equity
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Q4 25
145.17×
0.67×
Q3 25
0.67×
Q2 25
0.64×
Q1 25
0.66×
Q4 24
33.04×
0.83×
Q3 24
0.65×
Q2 24
0.54×
Q1 24
0.56×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.5B
$395.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.3B
$269.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
24.4%
6.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.4%
2.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.88×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$3.6B
$1.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Q4 25
$1.5B
$395.0M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$597.0M
Q2 25
$884.0M
$377.0M
Q1 25
$600.0M
$646.0M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$428.0M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$611.0M
Q2 24
$990.0M
$411.0M
Q1 24
$681.0M
$661.0M
Free Cash Flow
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Q4 25
$1.3B
$269.0M
Q3 25
$1.1B
$339.0M
Q2 25
$776.0M
$202.0M
Q1 25
$476.0M
$521.0M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$170.0M
Q3 24
$1.0B
$523.0M
Q2 24
$873.0M
$335.0M
Q1 24
$555.0M
$542.0M
FCF Margin
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Q4 25
24.4%
6.1%
Q3 25
21.6%
7.3%
Q2 25
15.2%
4.4%
Q1 25
9.7%
12.1%
Q4 24
21.9%
4.0%
Q3 24
20.5%
11.9%
Q2 24
17.3%
7.8%
Q1 24
11.0%
12.8%
Capex Intensity
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Q4 25
3.4%
2.8%
Q3 25
3.0%
5.5%
Q2 25
2.1%
3.8%
Q1 25
2.5%
2.9%
Q4 24
3.7%
6.1%
Q3 24
2.7%
2.0%
Q2 24
2.3%
1.8%
Q1 24
2.5%
2.8%
Cash Conversion
CL
CL
GWW
GWW
Q4 25
0.88×
Q3 25
1.72×
2.03×
Q2 25
1.19×
0.78×
Q1 25
0.87×
1.35×
Q4 24
1.72×
0.90×
Q3 24
1.58×
1.26×
Q2 24
1.35×
0.87×
Q1 24
1.00×
1.38×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CL
CL

Other$3.0B58%
Pet Nutrition$1.2B23%
Oral Personal And Home Care$1.0B20%

GWW
GWW

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons