vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) and Voyager Technologies, Inc. (VOYG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chatham Lodging Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($67.5M vs $35.2M, roughly 1.9× Voyager Technologies, Inc.). Chatham Lodging Trust runs the higher net margin — 1.1% vs -130.4%, a 131.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Voyager Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.1% vs -1.6%).
Chatham Lodging Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that invests in, owns, and operates upscale extended-stay and select-service premium hotel properties primarily across high-demand urban and suburban markets in the United States. Its portfolio targets assets with strong occupancy rates and steady cash flow from business and leisure traveler segments.
CLDT vs VOYG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $67.5M | $35.2M |
| Net Profit | $725.0K | $-45.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | -4.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.1% | -130.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.6% | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -64.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $67.5M | $35.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $46.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.4M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.3M | $45.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | $725.0K | $-45.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4M | $-31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.7% | -60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | -52.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.1% | -130.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | -70.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | -41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | -68.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.75 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | $-0.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.07 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.7M | $429.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $722.9M | $404.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $13.7M | $429.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.4M | $491.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2M | $413.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.2M | $468.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $338.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $338.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $351.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $381.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $722.9M | $404.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $740.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $749.4M | $590.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $754.1M | $554.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $754.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $758.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $765.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $766.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $727.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $685.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-39.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-66.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -189.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-263.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-39.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $64.1M | $-60.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.6M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.1M | $-30.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-66.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-54.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-53.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-88.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -189.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -135.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -194.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 97.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 126.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.90× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.24× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.78× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.68× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLDT
| Room | $61.2M | 91% |
| Other | $4.7M | 7% |
| Food and beverage | $1.6M | 2% |
VOYG
Segment breakdown not available.
