vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $34.3M, roughly 1.2× Clearfield, Inc.). Clearfield, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.8% vs -19.9%, a 18.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Clearfield, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-3.2% vs -20.7%). Clearfield, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.4M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp's revenue compounded faster (-3.4% CAGR vs -3.5%).
Clearfield, Inc. is a company headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The company produces fiber optic products.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
CLFD vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $34.3M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $-614.0K | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 33.2% | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | -5.3% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | -1.8% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.2% | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 67.8% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.4M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.9M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.2M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.7M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.8M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.9M | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-614.0K | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.1M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-447.0K | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.9M | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | 33.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.2% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.5% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.2% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.3% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.9% | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -26.4% | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | -1.8% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -38.8% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.4% | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.9% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.0% | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.65 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $96.4M | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $249.7M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $268.1M | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $96.4M | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.0M | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.2M | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.0M | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.0M | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.0M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.8M | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $142.9M | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $249.7M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $256.2M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.5M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.9M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $267.4M | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.8M | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.6M | $305.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $279.2M | $321.9M |
| Q4 25 | $268.1M | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $306.2M | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $314.7M | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.9M | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.2M | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.3M | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $318.1M | $412.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $315.4M | $426.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.4M | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.4M | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7.1% | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.4M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.2M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.7M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.4M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $654.0K | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.7M | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 323.0% | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.8% | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.93× | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLFD
Segment breakdown not available.
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
