vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) and Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.2M vs $34.3M, roughly 1.5× Clearfield, Inc.). Clearfield, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.8% vs -106.3%, a 104.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.4% vs -3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.4% CAGR vs -3.5%).
Clearfield, Inc. is a company headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The company produces fiber optic products.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
CLFD vs PLYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $34.3M | $51.2M |
| Net Profit | $-614.0K | $-54.4M |
| Gross Margin | 33.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -5.3% | -102.5% |
| Net Margin | -1.8% | -106.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.2% | -1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 67.8% | -248.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | $-1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.4M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.9M | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.2M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.7M | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.8M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.9M | $50.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-614.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.1M | $-54.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-447.0K | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.9M | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.3% | -102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -26.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -38.8% | -106.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.4% | 309.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.0% | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.65 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $3.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $96.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $249.7M | $470.1M |
| Total Assets | $268.1M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $96.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $142.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $646.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $249.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $256.2M | $470.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.5M | $539.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.9M | $571.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $267.4M | $579.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.8M | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.6M | $475.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $279.2M | $484.6M |
| Q4 25 | $268.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $306.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $314.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $318.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $315.4M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.4M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2M | $96.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.2M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.7M | $16.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $654.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 323.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.93× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
