vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and Dexcom (DXCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEAN HARBORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.2× Dexcom). Dexcom runs the higher net margin — 21.2% vs 5.8%, a 15.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dexcom posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.6% vs 4.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Dexcom's revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
Dexcom, Inc. is an American multinational healthcare company that develops, manufactures, produces and distributes a line of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems for diabetes management. It operates internationally with global headquarters and R&D center in San Diego, California, U.S.A. and manufacturing facilities in Mesa, Arizona, U.S.A.; Batu Kawan, Malaysia and Athenry, County Galway, Ireland.
CLH vs DXCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $267.3M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 62.9% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 25.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 21.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 21.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | 153.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $0.67 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $994.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $267.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $267.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $283.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $179.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $105.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $151.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $134.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $143.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 62.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 62.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 60.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | 59.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 56.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 58.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 59.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | 62.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 15.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 14.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.67 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $0.67 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $0.37 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | $917.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $6.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $917.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $917.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $904.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $606.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $621.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $939.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $6.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $294.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $659.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $303.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $183.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $301.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $199.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $279.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $192.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $579.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | $208.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $96.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | $176.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $213.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 21.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 1.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 2.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 1.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | 1.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 1.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
DXCM
Segment breakdown not available.
