vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEAN HARBORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.2× Gen Digital). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 5.8%, a 9.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 4.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
CLH vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $541.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $264.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $405.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $470.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 27.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 3.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
