vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and G III APPAREL GROUP LTD (GIII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEAN HARBORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $988.6M, roughly 1.5× G III APPAREL GROUP LTD). G III APPAREL GROUP LTD runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs 4.3%, a 3.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CLEAN HARBORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.9% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, G III APPAREL GROUP LTD's revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs -3.0%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
G III Apparel Group is a global fashion company that designs, sources, manufactures, markets and distributes apparel, footwear, and accessories under a range of owned and licensed well-known brands. It serves department stores, specialty retailers, and e-commerce platforms across North America, Europe, and other key global markets, catering to casual, sportswear, and premium fashion consumer segments.
CLH vs GIII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $988.6M |
| Net Profit | $63.2M | $80.6M |
| Gross Margin | 30.5% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 8.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.9% | -9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.7% | -29.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.19 | $1.84 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $988.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $583.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $839.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $644.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $609.7M |
| Q1 26 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $80.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $48.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $114.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $5.8M |
| Q1 26 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 40.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 39.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 39.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | 42.5% |
| Q1 26 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | $1.19 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $1.84 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $0.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $2.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $548.0M | $184.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.8B | $6.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $548.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $184.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $301.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $257.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $181.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $104.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $414.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $508.4M |
| Q1 26 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $213.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $402.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $402.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $2.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.26× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-97.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-106.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -10.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $367.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $-97.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $75.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $93.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $333.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $-111.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $49.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $45.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $-106.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $64.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | $85.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $323.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | $-120.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | $38.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $32.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | 38.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | -11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 5.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | -1.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 6.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | 12.09× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 6.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | -0.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | 2.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 7.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
Segment breakdown not available.
GIII
| Proprietary Brands | $498.1M | 50% |
| Licensed Brands | $479.2M | 48% |
| Retail Segment | $45.7M | 5% |
