vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and PERRIGO Co plc (PRGO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEAN HARBORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.4× PERRIGO Co plc). CLEAN HARBORS INC runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs -127.8%, a 133.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CLEAN HARBORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs -2.5%). CLEAN HARBORS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.3M vs $148.6M). Over the past eight quarters, CLEAN HARBORS INC's revenue compounded faster (4.4% CAGR vs 1.3%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
Perrigo Company plc is an American Irish-registered manufacturer of private label over-the-counter pharmaceuticals, and while 70% of Perrigo's net sales are from the U.S. healthcare system, Perrigo is legally headquartered in Ireland for tax purposes, which accounts for 0.60% of net sales. In 2013, Perrigo completed the sixth-largest US corporate tax inversion in history when it reregistered its tax status to Ireland to avoid U.S. corporate taxes. Perrigo maintains its corporate headquarters ...
CLH vs PRGO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $-1.4B |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 32.6% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | -116.0% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | -127.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | -3093.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $-10.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $-1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $-44.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $-108.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.8M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 32.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | 34.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 37.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 37.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | 37.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.5% | 33.1% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | -116.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | -5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | -127.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | -0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | -10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $-10.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $-0.79 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.29 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $8.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $432.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $454.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $409.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $558.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $542.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.8M | $658.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $4.7B |
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $10.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $9.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $10.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | $175.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | $148.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | 13.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | $145.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $175.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $75.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $-64.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $312.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $42.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $148.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $-90.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | $274.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-119.4M | $-26.5M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | -8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | -2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 6.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | -0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
PRGO
| Consumer Self Care Americas | $697.0M | 63% |
| Digestive Health | $123.9M | 11% |
| Nutrition | $108.3M | 10% |
| Healthy Lifestyle | $94.8M | 9% |
| Pain And Sleep Aids | $87.1M | 8% |
