vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD (RNR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.5× CLEAN HARBORS INC). RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD runs the higher net margin — 23.5% vs 5.8%, a 17.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CLEAN HARBORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs -36.8%). Over the past eight quarters, CLEAN HARBORS INC's revenue compounded faster (4.4% CAGR vs -11.9%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd is a Bermudian provider of reinsurance, insurance and other related business services. The company operates in reinsurance, insurance and ventures.
CLH vs RNR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $2.2B |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $515.8M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 23.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | -36.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | 72.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $6.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $515.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $760.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $916.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $835.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $170.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $-189.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $503.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 42.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 46.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 43.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 25.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 26.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 17.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.57 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $16.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $19.40 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $17.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $3.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $-3.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $22.62 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $9.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $53.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $10.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $53.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $53.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $54.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $54.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $53.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $50.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $52.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $51.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $483.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $157.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $778.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 0.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 2.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
RNR
Segment breakdown not available.