vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEAN HARBORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.2× Snowflake Inc.). CLEAN HARBORS INC runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -24.2%, a 28.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Snowflake Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.7% vs 1.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Snowflake Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (25.1% CAGR vs -3.0%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
Snowflake Inc. is an American cloud-based data platform company founded in San Mateo, California, and headquartered in Bozeman, Montana. It operates a platform that supports data analysis and simultaneous access to data sets with minimal latency. It operates on Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform.
CLH vs SNOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $63.2M | $-294.0M |
| Gross Margin | 30.5% | 67.8% |
| Operating Margin | 8.1% | -27.2% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | -24.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.9% | 28.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.7% | 9.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.19 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $986.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $942.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $868.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $828.7M |
| Q1 26 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $-294.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $-298.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $-430.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $-327.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $-324.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $-316.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $-317.0M |
| Q1 26 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 67.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 67.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | 66.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 66.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 65.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 66.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | 67.1% |
| Q1 26 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | -27.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | -29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | -42.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | -39.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | -38.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | -40.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | -42.1% |
| Q1 26 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | -24.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | -26.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | -41.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | -33.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | -34.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | -36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | -38.3% |
| Q1 26 | $1.19 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $-0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $-1.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $-0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $-0.95 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $548.0M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $548.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $4.6B |
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $9.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $7.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $137.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $113.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 9.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $776.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $74.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $228.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $432.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $101.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $69.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $355.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $113.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $58.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | $183.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $421.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | $88.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | $64.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $338.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | 42.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 40.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
Segment breakdown not available.
SNOW
| Products | $1.2B | 96% |
| Professional Services And Other | $54.5M | 4% |
| Related Party | $6.7M | 1% |
