vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Molson Coors Beverage Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.8× CLEAN HARBORS INC). CLEAN HARBORS INC runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs 5.5%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CLEAN HARBORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs 2.0%). CLEAN HARBORS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.3M vs $-212.9M). Over the past eight quarters, CLEAN HARBORS INC's revenue compounded faster (4.4% CAGR vs -15.8%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
Molson Coors Beverage Company is a Canadian-American multinational drink and brewing company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois and Montreal, Quebec.
CLH vs TAP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $2.7B |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $150.1M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | 25.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $150.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $238.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $-2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $428.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $121.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $287.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $199.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $427.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 32.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | 34.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | -98.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | -84.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $-14.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $0.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $0.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $2.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | $382.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $10.3B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $22.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $896.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $950.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $613.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $412.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $969.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $13.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $22.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $22.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $26.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $25.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $26.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $26.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $27.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | $-212.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | -7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | $1.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $540.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $616.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $718.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $-90.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $494.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $521.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $869.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-212.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $357.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $-328.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | $383.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | $350.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $691.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | -7.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | -12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 4.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 2.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | -0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
TAP
Segment breakdown not available.
