vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.7× CLEAN HARBORS INC). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 5.8%, a 16.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 4.8%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $233.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
CLH vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.8M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.5% | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.29 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.8M | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-119.4M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
