vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEAN HARBORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.3× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 5.8%, a 8.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CLEAN HARBORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs 1.7%). CLEAN HARBORS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.3M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, CLEAN HARBORS INC's revenue compounded faster (4.4% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
CLH vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.8M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.5% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.29 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.8M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-119.4M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
