vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ClearSign Technologies Corp (CLIR) and Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ClearSign Technologies Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.7M vs $3.6M, roughly 1.0× Solid Power, Inc.). On growth, ClearSign Technologies Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (522.2% vs -18.6%). Over the past eight quarters, ClearSign Technologies Corp's revenue compounded faster (82.5% CAGR vs -21.9%).
ClearSign Technologies Corporation (ClearSign) is a United States-based company that develops emission-control technology.
Solid Energy was the largest coal mining company in New Zealand and is a state owned enterprise of the New Zealand Government.
CLIR vs SLDP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.7M | $3.6M |
| Net Profit | $-311.0K | — |
| Gross Margin | 21.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -22.5% | -730.1% |
| Net Margin | -8.5% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 522.2% | -18.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 73.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.7M | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.0K | $6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $401.0K | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $590.0K | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.0K | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $6.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-311.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $-25.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2M | $-22.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-22.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-21.2M |
| Q4 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 93.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -22.5% | -730.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -170.1% | -654.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1382.0% | -398.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -562.8% | -399.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -282.4% | -561.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -77.1% | -593.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4748.9% | -530.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -113.6% | -433.1% |
| Q4 25 | -8.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -138.9% | -693.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1263.2% | -390.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -517.7% | -251.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -197.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -62.1% | -482.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4160.0% | -438.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -100.5% | -356.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.26 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.30 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.37 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.40 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.30 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $9.2M | $250.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5M | $415.7M |
| Total Assets | $12.2M | $455.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $250.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $251.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | $230.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | $240.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.0M | $118.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $140.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6M | $146.6M |
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | $415.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.1M | $381.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4M | $370.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | $397.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.8M | $410.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8M | $439.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9M | $456.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $479.4M |
| Q4 25 | $12.2M | $455.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | $416.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2M | $398.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5M | $419.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3M | $448.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.1M | $470.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.8M | $492.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6M | $516.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.3M | $-18.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-23.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -633.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 126.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-83.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.3M | $-18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-511.0K | $-14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | $-26.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-415.0K | $-13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.5M | $-11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $-29.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-23.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | $-28.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-33.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | -633.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -397.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -264.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -278.1% | -476.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -416.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -271.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -305.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -556.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 126.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 41.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 39.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 105.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 59.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 86.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 68.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
