vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ClearSign Technologies Corp (CLIR) and Senseonics Holdings, Inc. (SENS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Senseonics Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.3M vs $3.7M, roughly 3.9× ClearSign Technologies Corp). ClearSign Technologies Corp runs the higher net margin — -8.5% vs -146.1%, a 137.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ClearSign Technologies Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (522.2% vs 71.8%). Over the past eight quarters, ClearSign Technologies Corp's revenue compounded faster (82.5% CAGR vs 68.1%).
ClearSign Technologies Corporation (ClearSign) is a United States-based company that develops emission-control technology.
Senseonics Holdings, Inc. is a medical technology company focused on developing and commercializing long-term implantable continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems for people living with diabetes. Its flagship Eversense product line offers extended wear duration, serving markets across North America, Europe and other global regions in the diabetes care segment.
CLIR vs SENS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.7M | $14.3M |
| Net Profit | $-311.0K | $-20.8M |
| Gross Margin | 21.9% | 53.8% |
| Operating Margin | -22.5% | -146.8% |
| Net Margin | -8.5% | -146.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 522.2% | 71.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 73.3% | -34.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-1.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.7M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.0K | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $401.0K | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $590.0K | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.0K | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-311.0K | $-20.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $-19.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2M | $-24.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-20.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-18.9M |
| Q4 25 | 21.9% | 53.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.8% | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.4% | 46.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.9% | 24.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.9% | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | -95.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 93.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.7% | 6.6% |
| Q4 25 | -22.5% | -146.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -170.1% | -242.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1382.0% | -215.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -562.8% | -215.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -282.4% | -172.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -77.1% | -535.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4748.9% | -400.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -113.6% | -361.2% |
| Q4 25 | -8.5% | -146.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -138.9% | -241.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1263.2% | -218.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -517.7% | -227.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -197.3% | -186.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -62.1% | -562.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4160.0% | -417.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -100.5% | -374.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $-1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.26 | $-0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.30 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.37 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $-1.67 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.40 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.30 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $9.2M | $94.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $35.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5M | $61.0M |
| Total Assets | $12.2M | $126.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.58× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $94.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $111.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | $126.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | $64.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.0M | $74.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $74.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $84.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6M | $98.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $35.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $35.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $34.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $34.0M |
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.1M | $78.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4M | $94.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | $35.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.8M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8M | $-17.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9M | $578.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $19.0M |
| Q4 25 | $12.2M | $126.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | $139.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2M | $150.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5M | $87.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3M | $100.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.1M | $96.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.8M | $111.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6M | $126.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.17× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.79× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.3M | $-18.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-18.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -128.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 2.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-60.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.3M | $-18.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-511.0K | $-9.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | $-16.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-415.0K | $-14.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.5M | $-11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $-20.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-9.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | $-16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-13.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-20.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -128.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -197.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -141.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -278.1% | -263.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -172.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -352.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -272.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -407.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.3% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLIR
Segment breakdown not available.
SENS
| Nonrelated Party | $7.8M | 55% |
| Related Party | $6.4M | 45% |
