vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) and TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.5M vs $9.5M, roughly 1.2× Cellectis S.A.). On growth, Cellectis S.A. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (375.0% vs 11.9%). Cellectis S.A. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.6M vs $589.0K).
Cellectis is a French biopharmaceutical company. It develops genome-edited chimeric antigen receptor T-cell technologies for cancer immunotherapy. It has offices in Paris, New York City, and Raleigh, North Carolina.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
CLLS vs TACT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5M | $11.5M |
| Net Profit | $-25.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | -181.1% | -10.1% |
| Net Margin | -265.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 375.0% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -51.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-551.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.3M | $-319.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 52.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -181.1% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -265.9% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -9.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $149.0M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $148.6M | $31.1M |
| Total Assets | $407.1M | $44.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $149.0M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.6M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $38.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $407.1M | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.9M | $609.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.6M | $589.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 290.5% | 5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.2% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $609.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-161.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $327.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $636.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-171.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $259.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | $499.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 290.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 242.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
