vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.4M vs $120.4M, roughly 1.5× Hippo Holdings Inc.). Hippo Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs 1.8%, a 3.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 18.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 18.9%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Hippo Valley Estate is a sugar estate found near the town of Chiredzi in Chiredzi District of southeastern Zimbabwe, on the Runde River near the border with Mozambique.
CLMB vs HIPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $120.4M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $6.0M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 5.6% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 18.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | -86.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $120.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $120.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $117.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $110.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $101.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $89.6M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $98.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-47.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $44.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-40.5M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | -41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | -40.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -43.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -45.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $3.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-1.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $1.81 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $-1.64 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $218.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $436.1M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $218.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $247.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $198.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $140.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $197.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $191.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $175.9M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $436.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $332.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $322.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $362.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $326.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $322.6M |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $9.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $9.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $14.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $46.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $-10.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-35.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-10.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | 19.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
