vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and H2O AMERICA (HTO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
H2O AMERICA is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($199.4M vs $182.4M, roughly 1.1× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). H2O AMERICA runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs 1.8%, a 6.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 15.3%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
H2O Wireless is a United States-based prepaid cell phone service, that utilizes the AT&T network. It is a brand of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Locus Telecommunications, a subsidiary of Telrite Holdings, Inc., since 2019. Locus was formerly a subsidiary of KDDI America corporation, starting in 2010. H2O Wireless is primarily advertised as a non-restrictive phone service for customers to bring or buy unlocked smartphones, although AT&T contract/locked phones may be accepted as well.
CLMB vs HTO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $199.4M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $16.2M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 16.6% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 8.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | -29.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $199.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $243.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $197.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $164.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $196.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $216.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $173.1M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $16.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $22.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $38.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $20.7M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 12.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $1.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $0.71 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $1.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $0.64 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $20.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $20.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $19.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $22.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $4.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $63.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.92× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $63.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $77.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $60.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $43.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $53.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $49.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 3.92× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | 2.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 2.61× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | 2.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
HTO
| Water Utility Services | $191.0M | 96% |
| Other | $8.4M | 4% |
