vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.4M vs $93.7M, roughly 1.9× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 13.7%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
CLMB vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $72.8M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $5.5M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 43.5% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | -7.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $65.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $396.1M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $566.2M |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $19.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | 3.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
