vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($190.7M vs $182.4M, roughly 1.0× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.4% vs 1.8%, a 15.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 8.7%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison or ConEd, is an energy company based in New York City. It is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $15.26 billion in annual revenues as of 2024, and over $70 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries:Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), a regulated utility providing electric...
CLMB vs PECO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $190.7M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $33.2M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 30.5% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 17.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 7.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 15.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | $190.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $187.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $182.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $177.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $178.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $173.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $165.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $161.5M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | $33.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $24.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $26.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $15.3M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | 30.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | 17.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 14.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 9.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | $0.24 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $3.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | $3.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $7.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $4.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $55.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 12.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $55.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $348.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $95.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $96.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $60.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $334.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $109.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $78.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 7.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 3.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | 7.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 2.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 18.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | 9.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | 5.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
PECO
| Rental income | $186.3M | 98% |
| Fees and management income | $3.4M | 2% |
