vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and PRA GROUP INC (PRAA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PRA GROUP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($333.4M vs $182.4M, roughly 1.8× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). PRA GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 1.8%, a 15.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 13.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 14.2%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
PRA Group, Inc. is a publicly traded debt buyer and debt collection company based in Norfolk, Virginia. The company buys delinquent consumer debt from credit card issuers and other financial institutions at a discount and pursues collection of the full debt owed. Founded in 1996, PRA Group employs more than 3200 people in 18 countries.
CLMB vs PRAA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $333.4M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $56.5M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 37.7% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 206.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $1.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $333.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $311.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $287.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $293.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $281.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $284.2M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $56.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $-407.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $42.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $27.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | -101.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 31.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $1.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $-10.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $0.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $104.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $979.9M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $107.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $131.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $128.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $105.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $141.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $118.9M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $979.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $928.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $4.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-85.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-90.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -27.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-169.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $-85.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $-52.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $-94.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $-35.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $-29.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-98.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-36.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | -1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | -0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | -14.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | -5.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | -1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | -1.37× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
PRAA
| GB | $170.1M | 51% |
| Other | $163.3M | 49% |
