vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Perella Weinberg Partners is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($219.2M vs $182.4M, roughly 1.2× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). Perella Weinberg Partners runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs 1.8%, a 4.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs -2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Perella Weinberg Partners's revenue compounded faster (46.5% CAGR vs 40.7%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
PJT Partners, Inc. is a global advisory-focused investment bank, founded in October 2015 as part of The Blackstone Group's spin-off of its financial and strategic advisory services businesses.
CLMB vs PWP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $219.2M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $13.8M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | -2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $219.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $164.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $155.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $211.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $225.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $278.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $272.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-66.0M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | -30.2% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -24.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $-1.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $255.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $-127.4M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $797.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $255.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $185.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $145.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $111.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $407.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $335.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $185.3M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $-127.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $-302.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $-318.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $-323.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $-421.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $-360.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $-283.0M |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $797.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $650.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $606.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $570.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $876.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $810.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $645.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $34.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $30.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.52× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-34.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $34.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $59.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $56.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $-176.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $223.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $200.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $90.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $57.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $55.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-177.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $207.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $83.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -83.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 91.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 71.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 2.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 9.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | 20.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | -10.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | 12.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
