vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.4M vs $120.9M, roughly 1.5× Sprout Social, Inc.). On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 12.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 11.8%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Sprout Social, Inc. is a technology company that runs a social media management platform. A public company headquartered in Chicago, it was founded in 2010 by Justyn Howard, Aaron Rankin, Gil Lara, and Peter Soung.
CLMB vs SPT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $120.9M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 77.6% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | -9.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $-0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $120.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $111.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $109.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $107.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $102.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $99.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-16.9M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 77.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | 77.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 78.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 77.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 77.5% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | -9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | -12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | -16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | -16.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | -10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -17.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $-0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $95.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $40.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $203.4M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $523.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.20× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $95.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $90.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $101.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $100.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $86.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $82.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $80.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $203.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $194.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $184.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $175.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $166.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $158.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $152.1M |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $523.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $481.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $422.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $424.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $428.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $388.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $393.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $10.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $39.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $18.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $2.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
