vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC (TR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($196.3M vs $182.4M, roughly 1.1× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs 1.8%, a 12.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 13.2%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Tootsie Roll Industries is an American manufacturer of confectionery based in Chicago, Illinois. Its best-known products include the namesake Tootsie Rolls and Tootsie Pops. Tootsie Roll Industries currently markets its brands internationally in Canada, Mexico, and over 75 other countries.
CLMB vs TR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $196.3M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $28.8M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 14.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $232.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $155.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $148.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $193.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $225.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $150.7M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $18.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $32.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $15.6M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | 35.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 33.5% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 10.2% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $176.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $941.0M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $176.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $119.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $170.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $176.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $194.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $163.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $131.2M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $941.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $918.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $893.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $879.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $870.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $870.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $841.4M |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $73.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $61.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 31.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 6.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $96.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $73.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $62.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $68.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $-12.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $750.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-16.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | -0.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 0.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 3.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | -0.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
TR
| Products | $194.3M | 99% |
| Rental And Royalty | $1.9M | 1% |
