vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and TRUSTMARK CORP (TRMK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRUSTMARK CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($204.1M vs $182.4M, roughly 1.1× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). TRUSTMARK CORP runs the higher net margin — 28.4% vs 1.8%, a 26.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 4.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 8.9%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Trustmark is an insurance company. According to Crain's Chicago Business magazine, Trustmark ranks #69 among Chicago's Largest Privately Held Companies in 2018.
CLMB vs TRMK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $204.1M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $57.9M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 34.7% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 28.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 2.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.96 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $204.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $202.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $198.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $194.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $155.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $192.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $141.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $57.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $56.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $55.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $53.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $56.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $73.8M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 34.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 34.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 34.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 41.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 32.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | -98.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 28.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 36.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 26.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 52.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $0.92 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.88 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $0.91 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $0.84 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $1.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $18.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $18.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $18.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $18.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $18.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $18.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $243.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $232.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 113.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $409.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $243.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $82.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $116.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $59.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $16.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $232.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $62.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $80.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $93.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 113.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | 0.67× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 1.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 2.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | 1.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | 0.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
