vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and WORKIVA INC (WK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WORKIVA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($238.9M vs $182.4M, roughly 1.3× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). WORKIVA INC runs the higher net margin — 4.9% vs 1.8%, a 3.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 19.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 16.6%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Workiva, Inc. is a global software-as-a-service (SaaS) company. It provides a cloud-based connected and reporting compliance platform that enables the use of connected data and automation of reporting across finance, accounting, risk, and compliance.
CLMB vs WK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $238.9M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $11.8M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 80.7% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 3.3% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 19.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 234.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $238.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $224.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $215.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $206.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $199.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $185.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $177.5M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-19.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-17.5M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 80.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 79.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 77.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | 76.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 77.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 76.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 76.8% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | -12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | -11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | -13.0% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | -9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -9.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $-0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $338.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $-5.4M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $338.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $315.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $242.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $301.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $248.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $267.9M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $-36.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $-66.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $-75.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $-41.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $-50.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $-77.7M |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $1.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $51.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $50.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 21.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $138.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $46.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $50.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $-14.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $50.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $43.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-122.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 4.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 16.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
WK
| License And Service | $219.3M | 92% |
| XBRL Professional Services | $16.4M | 7% |
| Other Services | $3.2M | 1% |